Friday, June 26, 2015

Max


Review Written By Michael J. Ruhland

Michael's Movie Grade: B

Review: Quite Good, if faulted movie. 

One of the strongest points of the film is simply the idea of a film about a military animal who suffers from a horrible experience he saw during the war is a fascinating and great idea for the movie. This idea is handled great as well. The film is at it's best when focusing on this idea. 

The relationship between the boy and the dog is also handled very well, and even if we've seen it a thousand times before. It is a believable friendship that does not feel forced in any way. The kid and his parents also seems like believable parent-child relationships.

There are however two big faults with this movie. The first is the inclusion of a villain, and a weak one at that. The dog's trauma, and relationship with the kid are both strong enough to carry the film, and the villain just seems tacked on and unnecessary. These are easily the weakest scenes of the movie. The second is one of the main kids friends, it is obvious the this character is supposed to be cool and hip, but he just isn't. This character can just be annoying whenever he is on screen. It is obvious that director/writer Boaz Yankin simply doesn't know how to write for this type of character. Both these faults can really hurt the film at times.

Overall if you can get past those two big faults this is quite a good movie, that I would recommend.

-Michael J. Ruhland

Saturday, June 20, 2015

Inside Out

Review By Michael J. Ruhland

Michael's Movie Grade:A+

Review: One of Pixar's best. Easily on par with the Toy Story movies and The Incredibles. Also probably one of the best animated movies of recent years (or even movies as a whole). About as good as it gets.

Pete Doctor as the director of UP, obviously knows how to play with your emotions (Pun very intended), and here as director again he does it masterfully. The opening of the film has the same magic and wonder of the storybook opening at the beginning of Snow White. This film also has some definite tear-jerkers, that are very effective. Not too much detail on those as to not spoil the movie for anyone. 

Despite the characters being based off emotions, they are quite complex. They are like all emotions pieces of one personality, but they still distinctly stand out, and are defined by much more than the emotions that are their namesakes. 

One of the most important things when it comes to animation is character design. The designs of these characters are very appealing, and automatically give a likability to these characters.

Overall this movie is a masterpiece, that you have no excuse for not seeing.   But we aren't done here we have a short to review...



Michael's Short Grade: C+

Review: Cute, enjoyable short, but not much more. This film is far from Pixar's best short, but it has it's own charm. The song is the best part of the short and probably was what the short was based around (especially since the song was written and performed by James Ford Murphy, who also directed the short).

Overall a good song and a decent cartoon built around it. Enjoyable but not much more.
  

Monday, June 15, 2015

San Andreas



Review written by Michael J.Ruhland

Michael's Movie Grade:  C

Review: Surprisingly good action movie for what it is. No this is not a very intelligent film or a very original one, but  you have to have expected that going in to this movie. Especially with it being directed by Brad Peyton ( Cats and Dogs, Journey 2: The Mysterious Island). While it delves into too many cliches, it remains surprisingly entertaining throughout. The Characters while underdeveloped are quite likable, and you actually do care about them. The action while not the most spectacular is impressive.

The acting is quite good. While we often question the films he appears in, Dwayne Johnson (The Rock) appears in, he nearly always does a good job in them. Alexandra Daddario provides a likability factor to her character. Art Parkinson is a surprisingly good child actor who gets the only real laughs in the movie. 

However this movie is cliche ridden. Nearly everything in this movie has been done before. Both romances are about as predictable and bland as you can get. Near the film (not trying to spoil anything) dives into a cliche that has been done so many times that it can not possibly cause any suspence or emotional impact any more, and this movie milks it for all it can. This scene goes on too long and hurts the film a lot.

 Overall a surprisingly good film for what it is, and the cliches are not as annoying as they are in say Jurassic World, except for the one near the end I spoke about before. Never will this be a classic, but it is honestly pretty good. So as long as you don't have too high of expectations go see it.




By the Way....
-Michael J. Ruhland

Saturday, June 13, 2015

Jurassic World




Review Written By Michael J. Ruhland

Michael's Movie Grade:D+

Review: Great animation, and action heavily help cliche story line and even more cliche characters. This is the stereotype of the Hollywood blockbuster. It has a story and many characters we've seen before under other names. It simply existed for the action and effects, and this was of course where the movie shined. 

My favorite thing about the film is the animation of the dinosaurs. It was real animation, not just effects. The dinosaurs actually physically showed emotion. They were in fact much better than most of the human actors were. The action was quite good, and didn't drag on too long or overuse slow motion as many post-Matrix action films do (OK, I don't like The Matrix).

The story however was very bland, the characters blander, and the jokes blandest (there were no good jokes in this movie, and there were a lot of jokes). We have seen this all before.

Overall if you want to be amazed visually you will really enjoy the movie however if you want a great story look elsewhere. 

-Michael J. Ruhland
    

Thursday, June 11, 2015

Aloha

Review written by Michael J. Ruland

Michael's Movie Grade:C-

Review: Fairly enjoyable romantic comedy, never becomes anything more than that. Like too many romantic comedies, the comedy is never that funny. There are simply no true laughs. The romance part works better, while not anything especially great, it is kind of entertaining and the leads are fairly likable. Writer/Director Careron Crowe does manage to put in enough occasional nice moments to keep the chicle story from getting boring.

The acting is quite good, Braddley Cooper, Emma Stone, Rachel Adams and the rest of the cast provide their characters with enough likability that we can sympathize with them.

What really works in the film is the soundtrack. The choice of songs fit the movie to a tee. Whenever a song comes into the background it enhances the enjoyment and effectiveness of the film.

Overall a pleasant time passer, but nothing great.

-Michael J. Ruhland

Tuesday, June 9, 2015

Tomorrowland

  Review written by Michael J. Ruhland

Michael's Movie Grade:C


Review: With films like The Iron Giant, The Incredibles, and Ratatouille, Brad Bird has proven himself as one of the most talented film-makers today. However the greatness of those films can really hurt Tomorrowland in the eyes of his fans. That is not saying this is a bad movie (it isn't), but it simply can't hold it's own among the director/co-writer's best work. 

The visuals of this film are outstanding. While some might complain about an overuse of CGI, it is done very well, and fits in just fine with the story (without overshadowing it). The movie truly has a feeling of a spectacular sci-fi fantasy. 

The action was also well done. Unlike many movies today the action scenes never went on too long, and therefore never lost their sense of excitement.

The acting was pretty good.  Thomas Robinson's performance as a young Frank Walker was quite engaging, and gave a great sense of hope and childlike faith that was needed for his scenes, He also provided a great contrast with George Clooney's  older more cynical approach to the character. Britt Robertson was very effective, and brought an important likability to her character. While Raffey Cassidy brought out a rarely well-done human side to a robot character, without losing the robotic heart of the character. Unfortunately Hugh Laurie played a character that was too bland to care about, so it is hard to grade his performance.

The story begins as a fun action, Sci-fi adventure movie. This is quite well done, and even at times quite original. At this point the character's truly guide the story, and these characters are very likable, and relatable. We can easily see both our own optimism and pessimism in these characters. This also shows us fantastically how different people view the future with either or both hope and fear. This is truly great and subtle human, and social commentary (something the end of the film is sorely missing).  This section of the film is unfortunately not how the whole movie will be.        

The worst part of the movie is the approach to the film's message. The film's message simply should have been told more subtly. In fact it is told subtly at points, and it is still easy to understand the message when it does this. However the movie still feels it has to go into long-winded speeches about this. These speeches have all the subtly of an Al Gore speech, and about the same amount of excitement. These speeches are also an un-cinematic way of getting the point across. Another Brad Bird film, The Iron Giant, gives a great commentary on cold-war America, however that movie never  dives into long-winded speeches, but rather tells the message through the art of film and story telling. The environmental message of Tomorrowland, however, can at times delve into environmental lechers, and not very good ones at that. To make matters worse the villain is a very bland character that whenever he is on screen just seems to spout these speeches. All this would not be so bad if Brad Bird hasn't already proven that he could do all this better, with the subtle social commentary of The Iron Giant, and the complex, well developed villain Syndrome from The Incredibles.    

 However this fault does not completely rear it's head until late, in the movie, and up until then it is a well made, highly entertaining movie that while not a classic is quite enjoyable. The characters are likable, the visuals and action spectacular and fun, and the performances engaging. However do expect a story that starts off fun with bits of originality and great human commentary, but then delves into environmental lechers, that you can hear on a college campus anytime. Overall a good (if faulted) movie, that unfortunately can't live up to what Brad Bird has done in the past. 

By the way be excited, Brad Bird's next film will be The Incredibles 2. I have no doubt that will be really good. 


-Michael J. Ruhland